Health care services

Health care services

A particular focus is provided on for-profit public service networks, public services and health innovation (hospital innovation, innovation in retirement homes). The influence of the status of organizations (public, private, associative) and forms of partnerships on the dynamics of innovation is studied. Social innovation and value creation is another aspect of this research on service activities.

News

Researchers

Publications :

  • Paché G. () «2022, Doping in Professional Cycling: The Underestimated Organizational Dimensions» The cycling champion Lance Armstrong was at the heart of a doping system that gave rise to one of the most important scandals the sports world has ever known. Numerous studies have been devoted to the topic, adopting a medical, ethical, legal or psychological point of view. However, no research has addressed the organizational dimensions of an extremely sophisticated doping system that allowed Lance Armstrong to win seven successive Tours de France. The objective of this paper is to propose a reflection on these underestimated organizational dimensions, in particular as regards the management of the supply of doping products during the different stages (“étapes”) of the Tours de France. Beyond the specific case of doping in professional cycling, lessons can be drawn on the understanding of the logistical mechanisms related to the traffic of illicit substances.. Technium Social Sciences Journal. Nb pages: 6. ISBN: ISSN: 2668-7798 .
  • Gremyr I., Elg, M.; Kabel, D.; Olsson, J.,; Martin, J; & Smith, F. () «2025 Identification and Categorization of the Distinct Purposes Underpinning the Use of Digital Health Care Self-Monitoring: Qualitative Study of Stakeholders in the Health Care Ecosystem. .» Journal of Medical Internet Research.
  • Nanchen B., Bovigny-Sandoz Sarah, Ehrenzeller Luisa, Saviozzi Cristina () «2024 Vers un design de service transdisciplinaire grâce à la recherche‑action collaborative» Ce texte s’intéresse à la participation des personnes concernées au processus de conception centrées sur les utilisatrices et utilisateurs (CCU). Il met en évidence leur participation limitée, en particulier celle des personnes en situation de handicap (PSH), au processus de co-innovation, souvent can- tonnée aux étapes d’empathie et de test et sans voix aux décisions. . Cairn. Nb pages: 16. ISBN: 9782494241169. https://shs.cairn.info/innovation-booster-9782494241169-page-115?lang=fr.
  • Leväsluoto J., Martikainen, J, Pihlajamäki, J.,Kohl, J., Sigfrids, A () «(2021). Digitalization as an Engine for Change? Building a Vision Pathway towards a Sustainable Health Care System by Using the MLP and Health Economic Decision Modelling.» Sustainability.
  • Leväsluoto J., Heikkilä,Viitanen K, Tuovinen () «(2016). Gamification as an enabler of mutual learning in complex health care systems» International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications. Nb pages: 12.
  • Hyytinen K. m., Leväsluoto J., Toivonen-Noro M. () «(2019)Innovation by Experimenting in Public Services» Springer. Nb pages: 24.
  • Hyytinen K. m., Leväsluoto J., Toivonen-Noro M. () «(2017). Child and family services in the digital era. New opportunities for multiprofessional collaboration and the empowerment of users» The European Review of Service Economics and Management. Nb pages: 30. ISBN: 978-2-406-07406-9.p.0017.
  • laperche B., Boutillier S., Sophie Fourmentin (2020) «Food additives and the future of health: An analysis of the ongoing controversy on titanium dioxide» The controversy on titanium dioxide as a food additive (E171) is associated with the technological risk of nanotechnologies. The potential carcinogenic effect of E171 ingestion creates uncertainties regarding the future of health. • The controversy can be seen as a confrontation between stakeholder’s organizational routines. Public decision can be considered as a compromise between stakeholders’ positions. The controversy is still ongoing and necessitates adapted risk regulation.. Futures.
  • Lemos de Almeida J., J. P. L. de, Farias, J. S., Carvalho, H. S. () «(2017). Drivers of the Technology Adoption In Healthcare.» Brazilian Business Review. Nb pages: 15.
  • ., Fragnière E., ., Nanchen B., Hannart, S., Moulin, N., Rullac, S., Weissbrodt, R., & Baudin, C. (2022). (2022) «Concevoir avec et pour les personnes en situation de handicap» .